Thursday, March 31, 2011

Visual Pathetic Appeal

In my prezi titled “Unarmed but not Unharmed,” I am arguing in support of concealed carry on university campuses. My main claim within the prezi is that without concealed carry laws, universities fall victim to anyone who chooses to bring a gun on campus. I feel the only reason campus shootings are as tragic as they are is because no one could defend themselves with a gun and stop the shooter. Without concealed carry laws, the only people with guns are criminals who chose to break the law.

The first image in my prezi depicts a street sign that prohibits anyone from carrying a weapon on the campus of The University of Arizona. This image provides a nice starting point for my prezi as it works to show that the students and faculty on campus are unarmed. This image also works as pathemata as it displays the vulnerability of the campus to those who want to commit random acts of violence. The young woman walking in the image alone and unarmed demonstrates this vulnerability. The second image in my prezi depicts a gun in a backpack. The image works as evidence to show that shooters have and will continue to go to the lengths necessary to commit a shooting by unlawfully bringing a weapon on campus. The image works as pathemata as it pairs the innocence of the backpack with the danger of the gun. The backpack exhibits innocence as one immediately relates the backpack to a young and harmless student. The bright colors in the image also contribute to a sense of innocence that is contrasted with the darkness of the gun. The third image in my prezi is very startling as it shows an example of a shooter that has gone to the lengths necessary to commit a terrible tragedy. This is Seung-Hui Cho, the shooter responsible for the shooting at Virginia Tech. The pathemata at work in this image is Cho’s threatening pose with two guns along with the anger written all over his face. This pathemata works to show the types of evil and coldhearted individuals our university campuses are susceptible to without concealed carry laws. The fourth image in my prezi really hits home and works as evidence as it depicts The University of Texas massacre in 1966. The image works as pathemata as it depicts smoke coming from Charles Whitman’s rifle at a meaningful location to the students and faculty at UT. Not only are the students and faculty unarmed in this situation, but they were also powerless to Charles Whitman’s skills as a sniper and his range from the tower. The fifth image in my prezi works as evidence as it depicts the shooting at The University of Alabama. The image also works as pathemata as it depicts two innocent victims being taken to the hospital. The sixth image in my prezi works as evidence as it depicts the tragic shooting at Virginia Tech. In addition, the image works as pathemata as the innocent victim is being carried to safety and is bleeding. The seventh image in my prezi is of Colton Tooley, a student who shot off rounds into the air at The University of Texas and killed himself in the library. This image works as pathemata as Colton appears to wave at the camera and looks very frightening in his mask and suit. The last image in my prezi acts as a conclusion. Numerous things have been done in memory of those innocent individuals who have lost their lives in unnecessary tragedies like these. The image works to leave the viewer in a mournful state.

The specific emotions I’m trying to provoke in my audience are fear, shock, and sadness. I appeal to these emotions strictly through the images in my prezi along with the title. I also want my audience to change their attitude toward concealed carry laws on campuses. The interpretation that connects the audience’s emotions to this attitude is that prohibition of weapons on campuses is not preventing these random acts of violence from happening. Therefore, the audience should then support concealed carry laws in order to better protect students and faculty.

View my prezi here: http://prezi.com/a6de51mdswqx/unarmed-but-not-unharmed/


Photo Credits

Bates, Gordon. Street Sign. http://wildcat.arizona.edu/news/public-debates-guns-on-campus-1.1121002. 31 Mar. 2011.

Campbell, Matthew. Lights. http://www.cbs3springfield.com/news/local/7092846.html. 31 Mar. 2011.

Cho. http://netwmd.com/blog/categories/virginia-tech-shooting. 31 Mar. 2011.

Conn, Robin. University of Alabama Shooting. http://www2.ljworld.com/photos/2010/feb/13/. 31 Mar. 2011.

Gun. http://collegecandy.com/2011/02/23/university-of-texas-student-speaks-out-against-allowing-guns-on-campus/. 31 Mar. 2011.

Ohio State University Shooting. http://pinoytutorial.com/lifebytes/ohio-state-university-campus-shooting/. 31 Mar. 2011.

Tower. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/30075905/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/. 31 Mar. 2011.

The University of Texas. PCL. http://www.statesman.com/blogs/content/shared-gen/blogs/austin/blotter/entries/2010/10/14/utpd_offers_additional_details.html. 31 Mar. 2011.


1 comment:

  1. As a CHL holder myself, I highly approve of this prezi.

    However, I would like to point out that the photo of the woman standing over a student's body is from the Kent State Massacre, where the Ohio National Guard opened fire on protesters marching against U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. Leaving the image in the prezi may ultimately do you more harm than good, as it suggests that CHL holders would engage government employees in an emergency situation, instead of simply "shooting to stop" against a killer like Cho, thus hurting your ethos with anyone who recognizes the photo and historical context.

    Feel free to contact me if you wish to further discuss your prezi; I will be more than happy to help.

    ReplyDelete